CONCLUSIONI
Questa metodica offre indubbi vantaggi sia al clinico che riduce i tempi di trattamento e discomfort per il paziente grazie all’ausilio della terapia laser sia per il paziente stesso che riduce i disagi psicologici e funzionali legati alla condizione edentula. Il ridotto numero di fallimenti, la stabilità dei tessuti duri e molli perimplantari fanno ipotizzare questo nuovo concetto di trattamento per il mascellare inferiore una procedura terapeutica di successo.
DISCUSSIONE
La presenza in letteratura di dati e articoli scientifici a favore del carico immediato nel mascellare inferiore ci conforta nell’utilizzo di questa metodica che mostra un’elevata percentuale di successo a lungo termine.
Per i colleghi che ne avessero interesse è disponibile un video didattico dell’intervento.
Bibliografia
1. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: A review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11-25
2. Jemt T, Lekholm U, Adell R. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of partially edentulous patients: A preliminary study on 876 consecutively placed fixtures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:211-217
3. Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, Branemark P-I, Jemt T. Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:347-359.
4. Jemt T, Lekholm U. Oral implant treatment in posterior partially edentulous jaws: A 5-year follow-up report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:635-640
5. Branemark P-I, Adell R, Breine U, Hansson BO, Lindstorm J, Ohlsson A. Intra-osseus anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1969;3:81-100
6. Schroeder A, Pohler O, Sutter F, Tissue reaction to an implant of a titanium hollow cylinder with a titanium surface spray layer [in German].SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd 1976;86:713-727.
7. Albrektsson T, Branemark P-I, Hansson HA, Lindstorm J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direst-bone-to implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand 1981;52(2):155-170
8. Ericsson I, Nilson H, Lindh T, Nilner K, Randow K. Immediate functional loading of Branemark single-tooth implants. An 18 months’ clinical pilot follow-up study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:26-33
9. Chiapasco M, Abati S, Romeo E, Vogel G. Implant-retained mandibular overdentures supported by Conical transmucosal and standard MK II implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2002;4:190-199
10. Lorenzoni M, Pertl C, Zhang K, Wegscheider WA. In-patient comparison of immediately loaded and non-loaded implants within 6 months. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:273-279
11. Carlsson G-E, Lindquist L-W, Jemt T. Long-Term marginal peri-implant bone loss in edentulous patients. International Journal of Prosthodontics,2000;13:295-302
12. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard J, Behneke A, Behneke N, Hirt H-P, Belser U, Lang N-P. Long-term evaluation of non submerged ITI implants. Clinical Oral Implant Reseach,1997;8:161-172
13. Doring K, Eisenmann E, Stiller M. Functional and esthetic considerations for singletooth Ankylos implant-crowns:8 years of clinical performance. Journal of oral implantology,2004;30:198-209
14. Del Fabbro M, Testori T, Francetti L, Taschieri S, Weinstein R. Systematic review of survival rates for immediately loaded dental implants. Int J periodontics Restorative Dent 2006;26:249-263
15. Aparicio C, Rangert B, Eng M, Sennerby L. Immediate/Early loading of dental implants: A report from the Sociedad Espanola de Implantes World Congress Consensus meeting in Barcelona,Spain,2002.Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003;5:57-60
16. Cochran DL, Morton D, Weber HP. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding loading protocols for endosseus dental implants. Proceedings of the Third ITI Consensus Conference.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19(suppl):109-113